Back to Discover
Curiosity

Designing AI-Allowed Assignments That Invite Curiosity

A reusable design pattern for AI-allowed assignments that separates automatable production from non-delegable inquiry, defended by a worked example and a boundary check.

Before you enter

A complete interactive classroom, not just a preview.

Start when you are ready to enter this Stage's 8 scenes and explore, respond, and learn as you go.

8
Scenes
16 min
Estimated
Content language: en-US
Start this Stage
Sign-in may be required to play
What happens inside
  1. 01When AI Can Write the Essay, What Is the Assignment For?slide
    Question

    Open with the core tension: a typical essay prompt and a student's instant AI draft, then frame the driving question about redesigning for curiosity.

    • Show a prompt an AI completes in seconds
    • Name the unspoken assumption that 'more work' equals 'more learning'
    • Pose the driving question clearly on screen
  2. 02Your First Guessquiz
    Prediction

    Ask the learner to commit to one main move before the investigation explains the design pattern.

    • Commit to a single design strategy
    • Make an implicit assumption explicit
  3. 03Compare Two Assignments Side by Sideinteractive
    Evidence

    Let the learner toggle between an AI-flat essay prompt and a redesigned prompt, and see which cognitive moves survive when AI is used.

    • Toggle 'AI allowed' to see how each prompt collapses
    • Highlight which steps remain student-only in the redesign
    • Notice the moved cognitive load
  4. 04What AI Can Do in Seconds vs What It Cannot Inferslide
    Evidence

    Concrete examples showing which parts of an assignment an AI completes instantly and which parts depend on the student's local context and choices.

    • Summarize a stable text: AI-ready
    • Defend a personal choice tied to local evidence: student-only
    • Generate a generic argument: AI-ready
    • Justify why this argument fits this case: student-only
  5. 05The Design Pattern: Shift Load, Keep Curiosityslide
    Explanation

    Introduce the reusable pattern that moves cognitive load from production to justification, extension, and local evidence.

    • Move the prompt from 'produce X' to 'defend a specific X you chose'
    • Require local evidence the AI cannot guess
    • Add an extension step that asks the student to react to the AI draft
    • Keep one open question with no single right answer
  6. 06Redesign Your Own Assignmentinteractive
    Transfer

    Give the learner a draft assignment prompt and let them apply the four-move pattern to produce an AI-allowed, curiosity-sparking version.

    • Start with a familiar assignment type
    • Add a 'specify the choice' move
    • Attach a local evidence requirement
    • Insert an open-ended question the AI cannot resolve
  7. 07Where the Pattern Stops Workingslide
    Boundary

    Show the limits: highly standardized exams, pure recall tasks, and assignments with no local context still collapse under AI even with the pattern applied.

    • Standardized recall tests lack local evidence to require
    • Subjects with no shared text to defend against
    • The pattern improves design but does not replace assessment redesign
  8. 08Curiosity Survives AI When the Question Is Yours to Answerslide
    Resolution

    Answer the driving question directly and restate the pattern as a portable rule for designing AI-allowed assignments.

    • AI handles the draftable surface
    • The student owns the choice, the local evidence, and the open question
    • Curiosity is preserved when the assignment asks for justification, not just production
Discussion

Discussion threads for a Stage aren't available yet.

Where this leads

This path ends here.

Explore more

More in Mind & Society

See all